Budget should have allocated more funds for child protection Save the Children

Save the Children a not for profit organisation feels that following the amendment to Juvenile Justice Act JJ Act the government should have allocated more funds to the Integrated Child Protection Scheme instead of decreasing it by 1 3 per cent
Budget should have allocated more funds for child protection Save the Children

Looking at the Union Budget from the children’s perspective, Save the Children felt that following the amendment to Juvenile Justice Act (JJ Act), the government should have allocated more funds to the Integrated Child Protection Scheme, instead of decreasing it by 1.3 per cent. This means that promises made in the JJ Act to reform the system would have to wait for another year. Overall, the NGO welcomed the Budget and its focus on rural India, poverty alleviation and job creation.

The children who constitute 39 per cent of the population have once again been neglected in this Budget. In the backdrop of renewed focus of the JJ Act and an amended JJ Act 2015, the child protection sector deserved attention in the Budget. The Budget allocation for the main programme, Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS) has been decreased from Rs. 402.23 crore (2015-16 RE) to Rs. 397 crore (2016-17 BE).

Meanwhile, the NGO said that the allocation of increased 2.78 lakhs to Panchayat Raj institutions will allow them to improve conditions at the village level. Allocation of Rs. 60,000 crore for water resource management and another Rs 15,000 crore for Swachh Bharat Abhiyan are other welcome steps.
The allocation on Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan has been increased by only 2.2 per cent and been increased to Rs. 22,500 crore (2016-17 BE) from Rs. 22,000 crore (2015-16 RE). It is still 18.9 per cent lower than the allocation in 2014-15 BE (Rs. 27,758 crore). The allocation on SSA is only 1.14 per cent of the total Union Budget Allocation, which was 1.55 per cent at the 2014-15 BE stage.

The allocation for Mid-Day Meal (MDM)s scheme has been increased by Rs. 463.6 crore, which is an increase of only 5.09 percent from Rs. 9236.4 crore (2015-16 RE) to Rs. 9,700 crore (2016-17 BE). The percentage share of MDM in total Union Budget allocation has gone down from 0.74 per cent in 2014-15 (BE) to 0.49 per cent in 2016-17 (BE).

“Given the recent amendment on JJ Act, our expectation was the budget for child protection, which is currently less than 0.4 per cent should have been prioritised to strengthen JJ system,” said Thomas Chandy, CEO, Save the Children. As this is the first year of the United Nation’s new development framework — the Sustainable Development Goals — a special focus on education, health and protection of children was necessary,” Chandy added.
The Union Budget has a strong pro-rural investment focus, which has positive implications for cities as well. The large allocations for MGNREGA and farm irrigation, easing of farm credit and crop insurance may help address the problem of post-disaster migration of families from rural to urban areas in search of seasonal employment by providing more job opportunities in rural areas and softening the impact of drought and other crop loss events on rural population. Also, the development of rural-urban clusters will help redistribute the population of rural-to-urban migrants, take the pressure away from major industrial centres and reduce the crowding in big cities. Thirdly, a large quantum of grant-in-aid is going to be pumped in for development of areas under Gram Panchayat jurisdiction and urban local bodies. 

Previous article Government announces schemes to empower rural woman
Next article Farm distress Squashing tractor industry

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



- Advertisement -
The Changing Face of Rural India